Share This Article:
Adam Levell, Senior Counsel, NCCI
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f6da/3f6da6586a81ae9efd98aadc5e7bc4cc6b0d87ed" alt="Adam Levell 2018 gray bckgd"
Annializ Lima Hevia, Staff Counsel, NCCI
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89021/89021e35451db05064d813ea74eddec792887841" alt="Annializ Lima Hevia 4x5 1"
On September 15, 2023, the Supreme Court of Idaho, in Smith v. Excel Fabrication, LLC, reversed its previous precedent when it held that independent contractors are separate and distinct from contractors and subcontractors and, as a result, not entitled to workers compensation exclusive (WC) remedy immunity.
In this case, a sugar refining company hired a third-party entity to build a flight of stairs to its refining tanks. Subsequently, in 2017, an employee of the refinery fell from the stairs built by the third party and suffered injuries. The employee recovered WC benefits from his employer and sued the third party for negligent construction and installation. The trial court dismissed the case concluding that the injured employee’s employer, the refining company, was the third-party statutory employer and therefore, the third party was immune from lawsuit as a co-employee.
On appeal to the Supreme Court of Idaho, the court analyzed application of Idaho statute 72-223, which precludes injured employees from recovering in a third-party lawsuit against certain contractors, subcontractors, and independent contractors under specific circumstances outlined in the statute. The court concluded that pursuant to the statute and other WC laws, the term “independent contractor” is separate and distinct from “contractors and subcontractors,” and that independent contractors are not afforded immunity from tort liability under WC in the same way that contractors and subcontractors are. As a result, the third party that was determined to be an independent contractor was not a statutory employer or employee, and therefore was not entitled to immunity from tort liability.
With this decision, the court overruled its 2003 case of Robison v. Bateman-Hall, Inc., which, according to the court, unnecessarily muddled the analysis regarding third-party tort liability.
For more information on other cases monitored by NCCI’s Legal Division, visit previous Court Case Updates and Court Case Insights under the Legal section of INSIGHTS on ncci.com.
california case management case management focus claims compensability compliance courts covid do you know the rule emotions exclusive remedy florida FMLA glossary check Healthcare health care hr homeroom insurance insurers iowa kentucky leadership medical NCCI new jersey new york ohio osha pennsylvania roadmap Safety simply research state info technology texas violence WDYT west virginia what do you think women's history month workcompcollege workers' comp 101 workers' recovery Workplace Safety Workplace Violence
Read Also
- Feb 28, 2025
- Christina Klemm
- Feb 17, 2025
- Lainey Haynes
About The Author
About The Author
- NCCI
Read More
- Feb 28, 2025
- Christina Klemm
- Feb 17, 2025
- Lainey Haynes
- Feb 12, 2025
- NCCI
- Feb 11, 2025
- NCCI
- Feb 05, 2025
- NCCI
- Jan 30, 2025
- Shawn Deane