Share This Article:
![](https://www.workerscompensation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/tractor-7297718_640.jpg)
Was Farm Company’s Truck Driver a ‘Farm Laborer’ Exempt from Delaware’s WCA?
13 Aug, 2024 Chris Parker
![](https://www.workerscompensation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/tractor-7297718_640.jpg)
What Do You Think?
Townsend, DE (WorkersCompensation.com) -- In Delaware, employers generally are not required to provide workers’ compensation benefits to “farm laborers.” But what is a farm laborer? The picture that may come to mind is of someone working out in the fields all day loading hay or operating a tractor or other farm equipment.
A Delaware case involving a sharecropping company’s truck driver addresses how broadly courts may view the “farm laborer” exception. In that case, the driver was driving one of his employer’s trucks when he was injured in a motor vehicle accident.
The driver’s job primarily involved delivering farm equipment and crops, such as bales of hay, for his employer. He would also use farm equipment to load straw and pre-baled hay onto the truck for transport. He also sometimes served as a mechanic in his employer’s shop.
The Industrial Accident Board denied the driver’s claim for benefits on the basis that he was a farm laborer. The employee challenged that decision in court, pointing out that he was a driver with a CDL license and 24 years of experience who spent 90 percent of his working hours driving a truck.
Delaware’s Workers’ Compensation Act does not apply to farm laborers. An exception to that rule applies where the employer carries insurance to insure the payment of compensation to such employees or their dependents.
Was the employee a "farm laborer?"
A. No. He drove a truck, rather than engaging in farm work.
B. Yes. His function was integral to the farm operation.
If you selected B, you agreed with the court in Bailey v. RNJ Farms, LLC, No. No. N24A-02-003 JRJ. (Del. 07/24/24), which held that the claimant fell into the category of farm laborer.
Get the scoop on Delaware or the rest of the U.S. with Simply Research
The court pointed out that whether one is a “farm laborer” hinges on one’s function or work for an employer. It was true that the driver spent most of his time driving the truck. He was, however, transporting farm supplies when he did so; he spent the majority of time transporting crops for the farm, which often included hay bales.
The court noted that the trucks the driver operated were part of the employer’s farm business because they were owned by the employer and used only to haul farm items.
“[B]ecause Employee was employed by the farm, loaded crops onto the farm's trucks, drove the trucks to the farm's customers to deliver the farm crops, Employee's employment was integral to the operation of the farm business, and Employee fit the designation of farm laborer,” the court wrote.
The court affirmed the Board’s decision.
AI california case management case management focus claims compensability compliance compliance corner courts covid do you know the rule ethics exclusive remedy florida glossary check Healthcare health care hr homeroom iowa leadership medical medicare NCCI new jersey new york ohio opioids osha pennsylvania Safety state info technology tennessee texas violence washington WDYT west virginia what do you think women's history month workers' comp 101 workers' recovery workers' compensation contact information Workplace Safety Workplace Violence
Read Also
- Sep 10, 2024
- Claire Muselman
- Sep 09, 2024
- Claire Muselman
About The Author
About The Author
- Chris Parker
More by This Author
- Sep 02, 2024
- Chris Parker
- Aug 30, 2024
- Chris Parker
Read More
- Sep 10, 2024
- Claire Muselman
- Sep 09, 2024
- Claire Muselman
- Sep 09, 2024
- Liz Carey
- Sep 09, 2024
- Frank Ferreri
- Sep 08, 2024
- Claire Muselman
- Sep 08, 2024
- Liz Carey