Treating Injured Workers in the Workers’ Compensation System 

Leadership Link

Sarasota, FL (WorkersCompensation.com) -- The workers' compensation system, designed to support employees who suffer injuries on the job, often operates on a foundation of bias that unjustly treats claimants as potential fraudsters versus human beings who have sustained an injury while at a specific location or work. This pervasive bias impacts the fairness and effectiveness of the system, leading to mistrust and dissatisfaction among injured workers. By examining the ethical implications of such biases, the workers’ compensation system could incorporate a more empathetic approach to handling workers' compensation claims. This shift in perspective can lead to better outcomes for workers and organizational cultures everywhere, including increased employee morale, reduced turnover, and a more positive public perception of the organization's commitment to its workers. 

Understanding Bias in the Workers' Compensation System 

The workers' compensation system was established to protect employers and provide benefits to employees injured on the job, including medical and indemnity benefits. These statutory benefits are clearly outlined in 50 states and overseen by state compliance organizations. Despite its straightforward nature, the system faces numerous ethical issues in helping injured workers on their road to recovery. 

Bias in the workers' compensation system significantly impacts the treatment of injured workers. Unconscious bias, as described by Howard J. Ross in Everyday Bias, affects decision-making processes, leading to confirmation bias, where claims adjusters and employers focus on evidence that supports their belief that many claims are fraudulent. This bias is reinforced by negativity bias, which overemphasizes negative information, overshadowing the actual circumstances of the injury (Ross, 2014). Affinity bias complicates the issue by giving preferential treatment to those similar to the decision-makers, undermining fairness (Ross, 2014). Additionally, anchoring bias, where initial information heavily influences judgments, and availability bias, where recent impactful information skews assessments, perpetuate injustice (Ross, 2014). Employers often harbor recency bias, viewing every claim with suspicion based on the most recent negative experience with a claim. 

Ethical Orientation and Professional Work 

From my professional experiences as a claims adjuster and as an employer, I have learned that understanding others begins with self-awareness and empathy​. In workers' compensation, this means recognizing the humanity of injured workers and not reducing them to mere statistics or potential fraudsters. Treating injured workers as individuals aligns with the ethical principle of fairness, which is crucial for ensuring just outcomes in workers' compensation claims. This approach fosters a supportive environment and enhances trust and cooperation between employees and the system. 

Incorporating principles from Craig Johnson's Meeting the Ethical Challenges of Leadership further strengthens this ethical foundation. Johnson emphasizes the importance of moral imagination, which involves envisioning the full range of possibilities in a given situation and considering the potential impact on all stakeholders. By applying moral imagination, leaders in workers' compensation can better understand the diverse circumstances of injured workers and advocate for fair treatment. Leaders also play a crucial role in promoting ethical decision-making models, such as the PLUS model, which stands for Policies, Legal, Universal, and Self. This model encourages leaders to consider whether their decisions align with organizational policies, legal standards, universal values, and ethical principles. Leaders must ensure that these frameworks are theoretical concepts and practical tools used in everyday decision-making. Using these frameworks helps ensure that decisions are made with integrity and empathy, promoting a just and equitable workers' compensation system. 

Critical Reflection and Analysis 

Bias regularly influences decision-making in the handling of workers' compensation claims. For instance, a claims adjuster might focus on minor inconsistencies in an injured worker's recounting of an accident, questioning the claim's legitimacy despite substantial evidence supporting the injury's severity. Often, claims adjusters must contact the injured worker and obtain a statement within 24 hours of the reported injury. This urgency does not consider the injured worker's state of mind or location at the time, such as being in an emergency room or still in shock. Similarly, employers often default to skepticism, influenced by high-profile workers' compensation fraud cases. This negativity bias skews their perception of genuine claims, even though 80% of claims have no issues and smoothly proceed through the system. 

Addressing these biases requires acknowledging their presence and actively working to mitigate their impact. This recognition is not a one-time effort but a continuous process that requires learning and self-awareness. Leaders must intervene when someone disparages an injured worker going through the process. The language and discussions about injured workers reinforce the need for empathy and fairness. We must remember that an injured employee has a name, a life, and a world beyond injury. Joe Smith did not miss his physical therapy appointment because he was faking his injury; the adjuster or third-party vendor scheduled his appointment when he was picking up his child, and he had no other option for parent pick-up. These experiences underscore the importance of continuous learning and self-awareness in promoting justice and fairness in workers' compensation and maintaining overall humanity throughout the process. This commitment to learning and self-awareness keeps us engaged in the process of change. 

Addressing Counterarguments 

Knowing right from wrong is only sometimes straightforward, especially in complex situations where biases are deeply ingrained. Many employers hold preconceived notions about their employees based on backgrounds, first impressions, and perceived work ethic. When an employee is injured, focus solely on their recovery and return to work, setting aside these opinions. Identifying and mitigating biases can be challenging, especially when employers with negative experiences in the workers' compensation system question moral reasoning. 

For instance, in cases where evidence is ambiguous, such as Joe Smith reporting a shoulder injury on a Monday despite coaching his daughter's softball team over the weekend, determining the right course of action requires careful deliberation and consultation with peers. Both facts and context are important: Joe can coach softball and still sustain a shoulder injury at work on Monday while lifting heavy materials. Helping employers understand that injured workers are not just their injuries but individuals with lives outside of work can provide valuable learning opportunities and improve ethical orientation. 

We must restore Joe to his pre-injury status, even if he is perceived as a poor employee who did not follow safety protocols. Ethical leadership requires treating all injured workers fairly without letting biases affect their treatment and recovery. Focusing on "back to work, back to life" and reinforcing the recovery process can discourage fraudsters, who are less likely to engage in a supportive environment. Consider where to focus your energy: proactively supporting the good or combating the bad. Emphasizing empathy and justice ensures a more humane and effective workers' compensation system. 

Moving Toward Action as a Leader 

As a leader, it is essential to implement strategies that mitigate bias and promote fairness. Proactive and easily consumable communication of expectations is crucial when someone is injured to ensure that employees and leadership understand their responsibilities. Regular training on unconscious bias for staff involved in workers' compensation claims is vital for raising awareness and reducing the influence of biases. Cultivating an awareness of our biases and recognizing their manifestations can significantly impact the care an injured worker receives. Promoting a culture of empathy, focusing on understanding and supporting injured workers, can lead to improved outcomes by addressing their needs proactively. Transparent processes that ensure equitable treatment of all claims are necessary to foster trust and justice within the system. These processes include breaking down communications into plain language for employees to understand, as statutory language can be confusing. Additionally, structured decision-making processes that emphasize fairness and equity are essential. 

The workers' compensation system must transition from a bias-driven approach to one rooted in empathy, compassion, and justice. By addressing unconscious biases and promoting fairness, we can create an environment where we treat injured workers with the dignity and respect they deserve." Leaders play a pivotal role in driving this change by leading by example, and it is imperative to take proactive steps to foster an ethical, supportive environment. This shift benefits the injured workers, enhances the effectiveness and credibility of the workers' compensation system, and leads to better outcomes for all stakeholders involved. Tomorrow can be better than it is today, and each of us has the power to make it so. 

Share This Article: