Share This Article:
Hartford, CT (WorkersCompensation.com) -- In general, the Connecticut "going and coming rule" maintains that a personal injury will not be deemed to arise out of employment for workers' compensation purposes if the injury is sustained:
(1) At the employee's "place of abode"; and
(2) While the employee is engaged in a preliminary act or acts in preparation for work unless the act or acts are undertaken at the express direction or request of the employer.
Back in October, a new law (HB6721) went into effect to expand exceptions to the "going and coming" rule for first responders.
So, what's new? The following information breaks it down.
'Portal-to-Portal'
The new Connecticut law extends "portal-to-portal" workers' compensation coverage to 9-1-1 emergency dispatchers. With portal-to-portal coverage, an employee's travel from home to the workplace or from the workplace to home is considered to be in the course of the employee's employment.
This means that an employee injured while traveling between home and work is eligible to receive workers' compensation benefits for the injury.
Connecticut had previously extended portal-to-portal coverage in various degrees to police officers, firefighters, and Department of Corrections employees as follows:
Job Type | Portal-to-Portal Coverage |
Police officers and firefighters | "In the course of his employment” includes departure from the place of abode to duty, the officer's or firefighter's duty, and the return to the place of abode after duty. |
Department of Correction employees | When responding to a direct order to appear at her work assignment under circumstances in which nonessential employees are excused from working or following two or more mandatory overtime work shifts on consecutive days, "in the course of employment" encompasses the worker's departure from her place of abode directly to duty, the worker's duty, and the return directly to the worker's place of abode after duty. |
Workers Comp 101: In McMorris v. City of New Haven Police Department, 115 A.3d 491 (Conn. App. Ct. 2015), a police officer's injuries were covered under the "portal-to-portal" rule. Although the officer was driving his children to day care at the time he was injured, he was where he would have been expected to be in the course of his employment as a police officer because he had not yet gotten to the point where he would have altered his route to get to the day care facility rather than go to the police station. His job duties included driving to work, so the act of taking the children to day care didn't remove him from the course and scope of his employment.
california case management case management focus claims compensability compliance compliance corner courts covid do you know the rule exclusive remedy florida glossary check Healthcare health care hr homeroom insurance insurers iowa kentucky leadership medical NCCI new jersey new york ohio opioids osha pennsylvania Safety simply research state info technology texas violence WDYT west virginia what do you think women's history month workcompcollege workers' comp 101 workers' recovery workers' compensation contact information Workplace Safety Workplace Violence
Read Also
About The Author
About The Author
-
Frank Ferreri
Frank Ferreri, M.A., J.D. covers workers' compensation legal issues. He has published books, articles, and other material on multiple areas of employment, insurance, and disability law. Frank received his master's degree from the University of South Florida and juris doctor from the University of Florida Levin College of Law. Frank encourages everyone to consider helping out the Kind Souls Foundation and Kids' Chance of America.
More by This Author
Read More
- Dec 22, 2024
- Claire Muselman
- Dec 22, 2024
- Liz Carey
- Dec 21, 2024
- Claire Muselman
- Dec 20, 2024
- Chriss Swaney
- Dec 20, 2024
- Claire Muselman
- Dec 20, 2024
- Liz Carey