Florida Court Clarifies When a Workers’ Compensation Carrier’s Subrogation Lien Should be Calculated Following a Third-Party Settlement

13 Mar, 2025 Rayford Taylor

                               

In the recent case of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Robert A. Lee, et al., Case No.: 6D2023-2377, the Florida Court of Appeals ruled that a workers’ compensation carrier’s subrogation lien should be calculated following a third-party settlement on the date of equitable distribution rather than the actual date of the third-party settlement.

The case involved Mr. Lee, who was injured when an elevator in the medical center where he worked plummeted to the floor without stopping, injuring him. At the time, Liberty Mutual (Liberty) was the workers’ compensation carrier for the employer, and it paid benefits to Mr. Lee and on his behalf. Mr. Lee eventually sued the elevator operator, and Liberty filed a subrogation lien in the case under F.S. 440.39(3)(a).

After the third-party case settled, Liberty sought its pro rata share of the settlement amount for the benefits it had paid. While the parties agreed that Liberty was entitled to 11.61% of the benefits paid as its equitable distribution from the settlement, a dispute arose over when to calculate that amount. Lee took the position that Liberty should only be reimbursed for the benefits it paid through the date of his third-party settlement. Liberty, on the other hand, argued it should be reimbursed for its percentage of the benefits it paid through the date of equitable distribution. This created a dispute over the proper “valuation” date. The reason it mattered in this specific case is that after the date of the third-party settlement agreement, Liberty paid out over $300,000.00 in benefits on behalf of Lee.

The Sixth District Court of Appeal ruled that Liberty was entitled to its equitable distribution as of the date of distribution of the settlement funds rather than the actual date of settlement. The court held that Lee’s suggestion that the date of settlement should be used found no support in the statute and, in effect, provided a double recovery for Mr. Lee by using the date of settlement.

If you have questions regarding this finding or any other workers’ compensation question, Rayford H. Taylor, Esquire can be reached at (404) 954-6949, or by e-mail at rtaylor@hallboothsmith.com.

Disclaimer

This material is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice nor does it create a client-lawyer relationship between Hall Booth Smith, P.C. and any recipient. Recipients should consult with counsel before taking any actions based on the information contained within this material. This material may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.


  • california case management case management focus claims compensability compliance courts covid do you know the rule emotions exclusive remedy florida FMLA fraud glossary check health care Healthcare hr homeroom insurance insurers iowa kentucky leadership medical NCCI new jersey new york ohio osha pennsylvania roadmap Safety state info technology texas violence WDYT west virginia what do you think women's history month workcompcollege workers' comp 101 workers' recovery Workplace Safety Workplace Violence


  • Read Also

    About The Author

    • Rayford Taylor

    Read More