Share This Article:
Lakeland, FL (WorkersCompensation.com) – An unpleasant work environment is something no one wants to deal with, but in some cases, the situation could be so bad that it becomes a form of discrimination under the law.
In those cases, it’s possible that an employer’s actions – or lack thereof – created a hostile work environment that violated a worker’s rights. A case from Florida provides some illumination on the issue of a hostile work environment and what a worker must show to prove that one existed.
Recently, in Errickson v. Lakeland Regional Medical Center Inc., No. 8:22-cv-533-VMC-CPT (M.D. Fla. 05/11/22), an employee alleged that she was discriminated against under the ADA due to harassment she was subjected to at work. In particular, she claimed that:
Supervisors and coworkers followed her and harassed her throughout shifts
- She received two disciplinary write-ups despite insufficient evidence that she was responsible for the violations or mistakes
- She was required to undergo a second fitness for duty evaluation after chemotherapy ended
- Her complaints of harassment were not taken seriously
In ruling against the employee, the court set out standards for what constitutes a hostile environment under the ADA, which are highlighted in the chart below.
Topics |
Standards |
Authorities |
Pleading a hostile work environment claim |
A plaintiff must allege that:
|
Miller v. Kenworth of Dothan Inc., 277 F.3d 1269 (11th Cir. 2002) |
Severe or pervasive conduct |
The following factors should be considered:
|
|
Offhand comments |
The ADA is not a “general civility code,” and simple teasing, offhand comments, and isolated incidents (unless extremely serious) do not constitute a hostile work environment |
Guthrie v. Waffle House Inc., 460 F. App’x 803 (11th Cir. 2012) |
In the employee’s case, the court determined that, while unpleasant, what she faced at work didn’t rise to the level of a hostile work environment. The court distinguished the employee’s allegations from another case, in which a worker aced more severe conduct. In that case, the woker endured “multiple angry text messages from her superiors, repeated orders to stay home … , and a repeated disregard of requests for accommodations to recover from a serious illness “ as well as a “invasive” personal questions and comments about her breast cancer surgery.
In the end, the court gave the employee a chance to amend her claim to be more specific about the work environment she faced.
AI california case management case management focus claims compensability compliance compliance corner courts covid do you know the rule ethics exclusive remedy florida glossary check Healthcare health care hr homeroom insurance iowa kentucky leadership medical NCCI new jersey new york ohio opioids osha pennsylvania Safety simply research state info technology texas violence WDYT west virginia what do you think women's history month workers' comp 101 workers' recovery workers' compensation contact information Workplace Safety Workplace Violence
Read Also
About The Author
About The Author
-
Frank Ferreri
Frank Ferreri, M.A., J.D. covers workers' compensation legal issues. He has published books, articles, and other material on multiple areas of employment, insurance, and disability law. Frank received his master's degree from the University of South Florida and juris doctor from the University of Florida Levin College of Law. Frank encourages everyone to consider helping out the Kind Souls Foundation and Kids' Chance of America.
More by This Author
Read More
- Nov 21, 2024
- Claire Muselman
- Nov 21, 2024
- Liz Carey
- Nov 21, 2024
- Frank Ferreri
- Nov 21, 2024
- Claire Muselman
- Nov 21, 2024
- Chris Parker
- Nov 21, 2024
- Frank Ferreri